Policy

The NRC Proposes Cheaper Rates for Advanced Reactors

Image: Architect of the Capitol

It’s pricey to get a new reactor design approved.

That comes as no surprise to the advanced nuclear sector, which is all too familiar with the extended timelines and high price of licensing its tech. But now, it appears the NRC has heard the industry’s pleas.

In a notice published Feb. 19 in the Federal Register, the NRC proposed a drastic cut to the hourly rate license applicants must pay when pursuing approval for advanced reactors. 

  • Advanced reactor companies currently pay the NRC $317 per hour to review application materials. 
  • That adds up when going through the hours and hours of review required in such a complex process. 
  • Under the new guidelines, advanced reactor companies would pay $146 per hour starting Oct. 1—more than a 50% price cut.

Get it all back: The new prices for advanced reactor licensing are linked to the NRC’s budget request for FY 2025, since Congress has not yet approved funding.

Under the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (NEIMA), the NRC is required to earn back most of its annual budget through fees. The commission’s budget request for FY 2025 is $994.9M, which includes $20M in carryover and represents a $30.8M increase over 2024 enacted levels. The NRC expects it will have to make $826.1M through fees—$610.1M from annual fees and $216M from service fees.

Notably, the rate cuts would only apply to advanced reactor companies seeking licenses with the NRC. (That’s defined as any company seeking an initial operating license for an advanced reactor, not renewals or amendments of previously granted licenses.) Other companies seeking licenses, renewals, or amendments actually face an increased rate, from $317 to $323 per hour.

Full steam ahead: The Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy (ADVANCE) Act passed in Congress with strong bipartisan support last year and was signed into law in July 2024. As a refresher, the law makes changes to NRC processes, including:

  • Ramping up staff to handle application volume
  • Taking on an international role in coordinating imports and exports with allies
  • Limiting fees on advanced reactor license applicants (hello!)

The law comes into effect on Oct. 1 of this year—the same date that the new NRC fees would kick in.

The NRC is accepting comments on the new rule until March 21. A final version of the new fee rule will be published once that process is complete.

+ posts

Lead Reporter of Ignition

Related Stories
FusionPolicy

The Fusion Energy Caucus Takes the Stage

In a country where it’s tough to find broad bipartisan support for most anything, fusion energy has managed to buck the trend. At least, that’s how it sounded from the stage Wednesday afternoon at the Fusion Industry Association meeting, where the US House Fusion Energy Caucus co-chairs and vice chairs reassured the industry that they’re […]

CivilPolicy

Cut That Red Tape, Says UK Prime Minister

The US and its new DOGE office aren’t the only ones slashing government programs in the name of efficiency and productivity. The UK has taken up the gauntlet, too. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has taken aim at the rules and regs governing the nuclear industry at home—namely, those restricting nuclear energy development to a […]

Policy

Nuclear Policy Under Trump, Pt. II

President Donald Trump is back in office, and true to style, he kicked off his second presidency with an audacious (and large) batch of executive orders. We don’t have to tell you that.  If the president’s day-one changes set the tone for the next four years, we might expect streamlined government licensing processes and shorter […]

Policy

Pew Finds Most People Support Nuclear Expansion

Despite the important role that nuclear plants play in supplying the US with carbon-free, reliable baseload power, they get a bad rap. Historical concerns over the safety of nuclear energy after accidents, comparisons to nuclear weapons tech and proliferation, and pushback from environmentalists over waste and radiation have all negatively contributed to the public’s ever-changing […]