CivilPolicy

The NRC Needs to Do More, Says Watchdog

NOAA data picked out the regions expected to be impacted by sea level rise by 2050. Graphic: GAO

A government watchdog is wagging a finger at the NRC for its backward-looking approach when it comes to preparing for climate change.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report yesterday that criticized the US nuclear regulator for how it assesses climate risk when licensing new plants and renewing old licenses. Instead of using projections for how nuclear reactor sites could be impacted by flooding, droughts, wildfires, and sea level rise, the commission uses historical data.

  • GAO conducted its review of the NRC as part of its big-picture survey of the climate vulnerabilities of the great American energy infrastructure.

According to the report, 75 plants in the US—both operating and shuttered—are located in regions that are expected to experience extreme weather events more often.

That’s not so egregious. But the watchdog also pointed out that when the NRC renews licenses for reactors, it doesn’t reassess climate risk, meaning that the 49 nuclear plants operating under license renewals were approved based on decades-old environmental risk data. 

“NRC has the opportunity to consider climate risks more fully and, in doing so, to better fulfill its mission to protect public health and safety,” the GAO wrote.

An action plan: The GAO made three recommendations to the NRC:

  1. Figure out whether the current licensing process does enough to mitigate climate concerns
  2. Map out a plan for fixing gaps in the process, and carry out that plan
  3. Pick out the climate change projection data that could be incorporated into the process

According to the GAO, the NRC is already working towards implementing these steps. In a response to the findings, Ray Furstenau, the NRC’s acting executive director for operations, wrote that the recs were “very broad,” but doable—even while he disagreed that the agency allows additional risk to sneak through its licensing processes today.

Since the agency’s mandate is to ensure safety, Furstenau wrote, “we cannot impose requirements that would increase energy resilience or require consideration of potential future climate impacts without a sufficient nuclear safety justification.”

+ posts

Lead Reporter of Ignition

Related Stories
Civil

DOE’s Liftoff Report to Fast-Track Nuclear Energy

Soaring electricity demand, a complete AP1000 design, and growing recognition of the existing nuclear fleet’s role in slashing carbon emissions prompted the DOE to update its advanced nuclear report.  The advanced nuclear report is part of the department’s Pathways to Commercial Liftoff series, which explores how and when key clean energy technologies could achieve widespread […]

CivilReactors

The DoD Gets Diggin’ on Project Pele

The US DoD project to build a portable microreactor for military operations in the field is officially underway. On Tuesday, the Pentagon announced that it broke ground at a site near the Idaho National Lab to support the build of Project Pele, which aims to produce energy from a Gen IV nuclear reactor for the […]

CivilReactors

The NRC Awards an MSR Construction Permit to Abilene Christian University

At long last, the NRC issued its first permit for constructing a liquid-fueled advanced reactor. Abilene Christian University in Texas received the historic permit to build a Natura Resources molten salt reactor, dubbed MSR-1, at a $23M test facility on campus.

CivilCommercial

South Korea’s Nuclear Utility Commits $40M to TerraPower

South Korea is taking its support for foreign SMR development to the next level.